I already wrote about for whom may be profitable blocking of the Suez canal. Now I want to introduce you some of statistics of cargo transportation along the Northern Sea Route in 2024
At first let me remind you about planned cargo transportation volume wich voiced by russian 'governor-general'(as he likes to call himself) Yuri Trotnev in official russian propagandist media 'Russian gazette' in december of 2023, since 2 months after HAMAS attack:
Last year there were 34 million tons. The target for last year and this year is 32 million tons. The plan has been exceeded, but next year cargo traffic should increase to 80 million tons.
Before we'll move on to statistics
https://t.me/general_governor/3184
Governor-general (plural governors-general), or governor general (plural governors general), is the title of an official, most prominently associated with the British Empire. In the context of the governors-general and former British colonies, governors-general continue to be appointed as viceroy to represent the monarch of a personal union in any sovereign state over which the monarch does not normally reign in person (non-UK Commonwealth realm). Governors-general have also previously been appointed in respect of major colonial states or other territories held by either a monarchy or republic
Well! Now let's go back to statistics! - https://portnews.ru/news/372158/
The cargo flow along the Northern Sea Route (NSR, Sevmorput) in 2024 amounted to 37,893,531.9 tons, which exceeds the previous record result by more than 1.6 million tons. Such data is reported by the press service of the Rosatom State Corporation.
In addition, over the past year, a record number of transit voyages was made - 92, and a record for transit cargo was set - more than 3 million tons. This is almost one and a half times more than in 2023.
Hm... But where are 80 million tons which promissed earlier?🤨 So, the Houthis' efforts were in vain?
Further - https://www.rbc.ru/economics/20/02/2025/67b600549a79479b3c106fca
According to the results of 2024, 21.86 million tons of liquefied natural gas (LNG) were transported along the Northern Sea Route (NSR), that is, 57.69% of the total volume of cargo that was transported along this corridor, according to data from the consulting company Gekon, which relies on statistics from Rosmorrechflot. The volume of LNG transported along the transport artery in 2024 increased by 1.73 million tons (+8.6%) compared to 2023. LNG provided the main increase in cargo traffic along the NSR, which in 2024 reached a record 37.89 million tons.
Oil also makes a significant contribution to the transportation figures - 8.1 million tons were transported along the NSR in 2024 (21.37% of the total cargo traffic; year-on-year growth amounted to 312 thousand tons, or 4.01%).
Gas condensate transportation also showed significant growth, by 235.5 thousand tons, reaching 1.32 million tons, or 3.5% of the volume of cargo transported via the NSR.
Coal transportation increased slightly (by 16.9 thousand tons), to 597.6 thousand tons.
Let's count: 21.86 + 8.1 + 1.32 + 0.598 = 31.878 million tons of different hydrocarbons, or about 84% of all volume of cargo transported!
Now let's compare - https://www.informare.it/news/gennews/2025/20250221-canale-Suez-transiti-4Q-2024uk.asp
The net tonnage of ships transiting the canal in 2024 was equal to 524.6 million tons SCNT (-66.6%) and the revenues generated by transit fees paid from ships amounted to 178.7 billion Egyptian pounds (3.5 billion billion dollars), down -43.1% on 2023.
Despite a 50% reduction in cargo flow, 524.6 / 37.89 = 13.84 times more cargo was transported through the Suez Canal. I think HAMAS definetly deserve the award from inhabitants of lubyanka, where was born the 'free palestine' movement🤔
russian propagandist media reportsThe Panamax container ship Flying Fish 1 has just completed its journey along the Northern Sea Route, navigating its way from St. Petersburg to Shanghai in 21 days at an average speed of 16 knots or about 30 kilometers per hour. What makes this voyage significant for the global shipping world and supply chain logistics is that navigating the traditional way through the Suez Canal would have taken two weeks longer. This achievement is now clearly feasible for objective comparison between the two routes.
The ship had originally departed from Istanbul en route via the Baltic Sea to and from St.Petersburg, sailed around the Norwegian coast and then across the Russian Arctic Ocean to Shanghai. The St.Petersburg-Shanghai leg took three weeks. According to Unctad, Panamax vessels currently cost an average of US$10,150 per day, meaning the NSR route was US$142,000 less expensive than the Suez alternative.
Very interesting! But what's further?
The Flying Fish 1 is registered in Panama and operated by EZ Safetrans Logistics based in Hong Kong. It arrived in Shanghai on September 26. The ship, capable of carrying 4,890 containers, marks a new standard for Arctic shipping, with previous ships holding only 1,500-2,000 containers. It did not require icebreaker support.
What does it mean? As minimum russian rosatomflot remains out of work after all - why do we need an icebreaker if we can do without it?🤔
I think, russians not interested in such development of events - they need to raise their price, right? They need to justify the presence of icebreakers. The impoverished and dying population of the regions of the far north needs to be proud, after all!🤔
BTW, Why don't we take a look at some of the important cities and towns?
Meet Murmansk - general and 'legendary' North sea port!
I've been there several times and last time in 2020. And I've got familiar persons there. They confirm these photographs
And This is Arkhangelsk. Not far from here in 1711 the famous russian scientist Mikhail Lomonosov was born
I've also been there! But only one time in 2012. There is no reason to believe that anything has changed there since then🤔
Do you know something about Tiksi? I'm show you
There are no roads here, except winter roads with many extremeky difficulties
There are no railways. All because of there are permafrost.
But there is an Airbase which earlier used regularly by strategic bombers Tu-95s in exercises, including one in 1999, in which bombers practice travelling to the Canadian arctic.
Peorle there surviving without perspectives. See the population rate
Let's be familiar with some characteristics of this port:
Total throughput capacity of the cargo sea terminal (thousand tons per year): 67,0
Maximum dimensions of vessels handled at the sea terminal (draft, length, width) (m): 3.9 / 129.5 / 15.8
Who needs this port with these parameters except russian militaries?🤔
Here is Yamburg - russian LNG an oil are shipped from here
There is even railway till Novy Urengoi! But not actively from 2015. And even if it is relaunched, it is highly doubtful that it will be able to handle large volumes of theoretically container traffic🤔
For example Passenger train goes from Novy Urengoy to Moscow almost in 3 days covering a distance of 3647 km.
First 700 kilometers the railway to town of Yuganskaya Ob' is single track with single-track bridges over Ob' and Yuganskaya Ob'
Let's see the population rate
There are about 5-6 thousand people permanently in Yamburg, but none of them live there permanently. They are shift workers of the Gazprom Dobycha Yamburg enterprise or contractors. Shift workers work at the Yamburg field for one or two months, after which they go home for a break between shifts, which usually lasts about a month.
There is no free access to Yamburg. There is a pass system on all roads. You can get to Yamburg with a pre-arranged pass.
In other words, this is the so-called 'departmental' village. And they call those workers 'vakhtoviki' - from 'vakhta' means shift work.
Nobody wants to live there permanently in conditions of permafrost without roads, with extremely cold in winter and highest prices for all commodities
There is also Varandey
Currently, Varandey, a shift camp at the Lukoil oil terminal with a capacity of 12 million tons of oil per year, is used for shipping oil produced in the northern part of the Timan-Pechora oil and gas province.
It's also 'departmental' settlement without permanent population and of course without roads and railway. Would you send containers here?🤨
That's all potential ports on this route!
But I know - someone of russian travel-blogers will of course disagree with much of what I wrote above! Let's see on these guys!
So-called 'ambassador of Arctic' (as he likes to call himself) Bogdan Bulychev and Aleksei Zhirukhin
Joined their company Aleksandr Elikov. Here they all together with some of russian officials - mentioned earlier 'general-governor' and so-called 'Minister of Development of the Far East and the Arctic' Aleksey Chekunkov.
Since december 2022 Chekunkov sanctioned by EU. Let's see for what:
Under his control, the resources of the eastern regions of Russia were used in the so-called 'Donetsk People’s Republic', the EU sanctions justification states.
Read more in russian (use translator!) here - https://verstka.media/portret-rossiyskogo-ministra-alexeya-chekunkova-almazy-lobbizm-i-investicii-v-chudo-mashinu
Another couple of good shots
Here Elikov and Bulychev with governor of Amur region
And here Bulychev with another 'polar traveler' and also member of russian geographical society Evgeniy Shatalov gathered together with Trutnev, Chekunkov and the Governor of Yakutia Aysen Nikolayev
For more information here Bulychev with Governor of Magadan region Sergei Nosov
And here here he is with his wife and member of his travel crew near ex-governor of Magadan region Vladimir Pechenyi
...with ex-Governor of Yaroslavl region Anatoliy Lisitsyn
And here young Bogdan (around in 2013) with another ex-Governor of Yaroslavl region Sergei Yastrebov together with 'first cosmic woman' and state Duma deputy Valentina Tereshkova
All these photos should tell us that Bogdan Bulychev - son of ex-Deputy Head of the Labor Department of Magadan region Yuriy Bulychev - not 'simply random' person🤔
A little 'apart' from listed above Sergei Simonov a.k.a Saiman He also member of russian geographical society and likes to ride to Tiksi on the winter roads
And like his colleague Bogdan going to the front 'with humanitarian aid'...
...Saiman likes to travel to the occupied regions of Ukraine, about which he writes in Telegram-channel - https://t.me/saimanblog
All these 'heroes' will tell you about how beautiful russia in winter, how happy and undoubtedly 'heroic' it's people and etc...
In the context of our story we can't do without icebreakers
I mentioned so-called 'russian geographical society' earlier, so let me also remind you who its leader is - now already ex-minister of defense and active secretary of the Security Council of so-called 'russian federation' and war criminal - Sergei Shoigu
And so-called 'chairman of the 'Board of Trustees' - also known as war criminal and part-time so-called 'president'of so-called 'russian federation'
These members of 'Board of Trustees' gives us an idea of who the main beneficiaries of this propaganda resource are. Here is almost the entire 'galaxy' of the main russian oligarchs included in the sanctions lists, as well as State Duma deputies and other persons close to the russian Tsar. Even chinese billionaire and owner of Alibaba Jack Ma, probably on orders from the Chinese Communist Party😃
You can read more about this list HERE. But in russian - use built-in translaror!
BTW, Canada added 'russian geographical society' (also known as RGO - 'russkoye geographicheskoe obschestvo') to their sanction list under 466 position
Now it will become clearer to you why all the bloggers listed above have no rights to deviate from the official agenda - otherwise they will stop feeding them or even start persecuting them. And for western people they create the picture of 'russia - country of borderless oporunities'. And Northern Sea Route - just only one of them.
By the way it's time to returh to it! What they are writing else?
This route is part of a broader trend, with up to 20 Arctic transits between Russian and Chinese ports taking place this year. According to forecasts by Rosatom the route will see 270m tons of cargo in 2035. Generally, a Panamax vessel ranges from 50,000 to 80,000 deadweight tons (DWTs), implying that Russia predicts between 3,850 and 5,400 Panamax vessels using the route annually within a decade, providing cost savings over the Suez Canal route of between US$546 million and US$767 million per annum.
Having failed once again to reach the previously planned 80 million, they are already predicting 270 million in 2035! That is, in just 10 years🤣 They even counted all 'cost savings'! Let's try to hold out and then we will definitely return to this material, ok? This is very interesting!😉
Let's see what write another specialized press
Since the Red Sea and the Suez Canal account for about 15% of global trade and twice for global container traffic, this deviation (The Great Rerouting) comes with substantial costs, disruptions, and delays, mostly for European supply chains. Using the case between Shanghai, the world’s largest container port, and Rotterdam, the largest container port in Europe, a container shipping service using the Suez Route covers about 10,600 nautical miles in about 27 days if a speed of 16 knots is assumed, and with no ports of call. In reality, a typical Asia-Europe sequence can take 35 days with 5 to 10 ports of call. The alternative, the Cape Route, involves a distance of 13,800 nautical miles in about 35 days at a speed of 16 knots, adding a minimum of 7 days of transit, but figures of 10 to 14 days are more common due to ports of call. The risk is also reflected in cargo and ship insurance rates, which have increased up to 1% of the total cargo value, from the usual 0.1%.
Well, russian propaganda has noted everything fairly! But
The Northern Sea Route is not an alternative, even if it appears to be an attractive proposition, with a transit time of 20 days, which is only available for a few months during the summer (July to September). However, there are no container shipping lines using this route, and its commercial potential is negligible at this point.
Another quote
The Northern Sea Route (NSR) along the Arctic coast of Russia. This is the maritime route that is likely to be free of ice first and thus represents the highest commercial potential. It would reduce a maritime journey between East Asia and Western Europe from 21,000 km using the Suez Canal to 12,800 km, cutting transit time by 10-15 days. During the Soviet Era, the NSR was used to resupply military and resource extraction along the Soviet Arctic. Still, this traffic dropped in the early 1990s with the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was only in the late 2000s that interest and traffic picked up. In 2009, two German ships, Beluga Fraternity and Beluga Foresight, completed with a Russian icebreaker escort the first commercial journey across the Northern Sea Route (or Northeast Passage) linking Busan to Rotterdam with several stopovers. Other shipping lines have also run trials, but these trials did not show much commercial potential. The 3,600 TEU ships Venta Maersk used this route in 2018, representing the first trial inter-range container service. In 2024, the first Panamax containership crossed the route without an icebreaker escort...
First, it is uncertain to what extent the receding perennial ice cover is a confirmed trend or simply part of a long-term climatic cycle. It is also difficult to predict annual variations in the ice cover, underlining unstable navigation conditions. Even if the Arctic routes became regularly open during the summer, the Arctic would remain closed to commercial navigation during the winter months (unless there are dramatic shifts in weather patterns). As of 2010, the ice-free conditions of most Arctic shipping routes were only for about 30 days. (note - It was under these very conditions that the container ship reported by russian propagandists passed) There is uncertainty in terms of the seasonal shipping window, making the planning of voyages and itineraries uncertain. Since maritime shipping companies are looking for regular and consistent services, this seasonality has limited commercial appeal. There are uncertain economic gains from shorter Arctic shipping routes.
Second, there is very limited economic activity around the Arctic Circle, implying that shipping services crossing the Arctic have almost no opportunity to drop and pick up cargo as they pass through. Thus, unlike other long-distance commercial shipping routes, there is limited revenue generation potential for shipping lines along the Arctic route, which forbids the emergence of transshipment hubs. Shipping in the Arctic is suitable for point-to-point services that directly link a source port to a destination port. This value proposition could improve if resources (oil and mining) around the Arctic are extracted in greater quantities, which would favor bulk shipping. This would mostly take place along the Siberian coast.
The Arctic remains a frontier in terms of weather forecasting, charting, and building a navigation system, implying uncertainties and unreliability for navigation. Thus, climatic change may impose an additional risk to navigation around the Arctic. The decrease in sea ice extent and its smaller volume are linked with the growing mobility of summer sea ice as well as more coastal erosion. Substantial efforts have to be made to ensure that navigation can take place in a safe manner along well-defined and patrolled navigation routes. The bathymetry in the Arctic is usually shallow, which limits the size of the ships that could be operated in these waters. Ships also need to be certified to operate in arctic conditions, which increases costs and undermines the economic benefits of the route. Circulation is often required to take place as a convoy spearheaded by an icebreaker, which is subject to additional costs. (note - As you may recall, that container ship was not accompanied by an icebreaker and, accordingly, the price did not include Rosatomflot's services) Insurance rates are also much higher in taking care of the involved risks, which are not straightforward to assess.
The setting of rail corridors between China and Europe across Central Asia (the Eurasian landbridge, also known as the Belt and Road initiative) is offering an option that is more stable and time performing than the Arctic routes...
Polar routes remain a niche market that has potential, but the nature and extent of this market remain unclear. In 2021, several shipping lines, including MSC, underlined that they do not seek to use Arctic routes in the future, mainly because navigation is hazardous and unreliable ship and crew rescue options.
There is something to think about🤔
Now let's dive deeper into the depths of Russian projects! This is what a certain publication Eurasianecomnomics tells us
Today, there is already an explosive growth in traffic along the Northern Sea Route (NSR): according to the forecast in the NSR Development Plan until 2035, a cargo flow of 36 million tons was expected in 2023. Although today, this figure has already been exceeded by 250 thousand tons. And this year, there should be a more than twofold increase in traffic - more than 90 million tons of cargo.
🤣They planned 36 millions but they've got 'explosive growth' in 250 thousands tons! 0.7% - definetly atomic explosion!🤣 It was probably that container ship that provided it🤔 Now russians will point this 'unfortunate' container ship at everyone in the world, proving its 'efficiency', while deliberately keeping silent about the details of how they deal with everything else😃
Please note that this figure planned to transport 90 million - 10 million more than Trutnev promised. But, as they say, something went wrong🤔
And all this is according to their development plan until 2035. You are on the right path, comrades!
According to the plans of the Russian Government, by 2030 the volume of cargo transportation along the NSR should increase to 150 million tons, and the plan for the development of the Northern Sea Route until 2035 has an even more ambitious figure – more than 216.45 million tons.
Although a little earlier we were promised 270 million tons🙄
Some experts believe that if the ice melts, then everything will be just fine from the point of view of traffic; and if there is no warming, then the costs of passage of cargo ships with icebreakers may be lower than those that an encounter with pirates promises. Moreover, Russia has the largest icebreaker fleet in the world - today, according to the Ministry of Transport, it consists of 34 diesel-electric icebreakers and seven nuclear-powered ones.
If the ice will melted, for who and for what will your 34 icebreakers be needed?
If you expect the ice to melt, why do you need new icebreakers?
But if the ice conditions will the same, are you sure that the speed of passage will be the same as in the summer?
Any thoughts?🤨
Then russian propagandists begin their descent from heaven to earth😃
It can be said that the idea of an alternative transit, or the 'Northern Silk Road', as some media outlets called the Northern Sea Route, did not work out: the ice did not melt, and dealing with pirates with the help of private military companies turned out to be cheaper and easier than driving transport ships with icebreakers.
Apparently, hopes were also placed on the Somali pirates, as well as on the Houthis, but they were not fulfilled🤔
Experts of the Eurasian Economic Union note that the implementation of further development of the Northern Sea Route is associated with significant technological, economic and political problems, difficulties with the communications infrastructure. Only ships with an ice class are allowed to pass through the NSR, and their cost is 10-30% higher.
Other areas that should minimize the risks of using the NSR include creating a sustainable communications system, improving navigation safety, and an emergency rescue system in the Arctic.
So far, none of the satellite communications operators operating in the region operate in the polar regions above 70-75° north latitude. The analysis conducted allows us to assert that due to high geomagnetic activity in the polar latitudes, there are problems with the operation of navigation systems.
Builded plans but how it will be implemented - not thought. It seems that we have already seen the results of this in the 2024 figures🤔
But these are certainly not the only and perhaps not the main difficulties!
There are also technical problems with piloting merchant ships with icebreakers. The width of the nuclear icebreakers "Arktika" (Project 22220) is 34 meters, the width of the four other nuclear ships in the Rosatom flotilla is 29.2 meters. Even the largest icebreaker of Project 10510 "Lider", which is only under construction, will have a width of 47.7 meters. And this is not so much by today's standards....
In the list of the largest container ships by the end of 2023, the first 80 lines are occupied by ships with a width of 61 meters, although in 2020 there were only 25 of them. They are followed by several dozen container ships with a width of about 59 meters. The largest Chinese container ships built in 2006-2011 (Cosco Oceania, Cosco Asia, Cosco Guangzhou, CSCL Star, CSCL Venus) have a width of 43 to 52 meters. They cannot squeeze through behind Russian icebreakers. But there are no problems with passage through the Suez Canal yet: its width reaches 135 meters, and ships up to 77.5 meters wide and with a displacement of up to 240 thousand tons can pass through it.
WOW! How unexpectable disclosure!🤣
And in the end the mother-nature does not live up to expectations😃
With hopes for global warming, everything is also very ambiguous.
Warming can lead to the melting of permafrost, and this will seriously complicate or make impossible the construction work on the creation of coastal infrastructure. And if such infrastructure is created, it may not pay off even with international commercial exploitation of the NSR.
Warming is a very insidious thing from the point of view of the economy - we can lose from the melting of permafrost much more than we can gain from navigation along the Northern Sea Route. Permafrost occupies two-thirds of the area of russia, and up to half of all oil and gas production capacities and pipelines are concentrated on it. The scale of the possible damage is not difficult to imagine.
How about another plans?
The Baltic Shipyard is scheduled to deliver two serial universal nuclear icebreakers of Project 22220 – Yakutia and Chukotka (classmates of Arktika) – by the end of 2024 and in 2026. In 2023, state contracts were signed for the construction of two more vessels of the same project – Leningrad and Stalingrad. The keel of the first one was laid in January of this year, the keel of the second one is scheduled for October of next year. The Zvezda Shipbuilding Corporation is building an icebreaker of Project 10510 Lider with a capacity of 120 MW – it should be launched in 2027.
Another propaganda media is broadcasting
By 2030, 11 icebreakers should provide cargo flow in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation. Taking into account the current fleet, three icebreakers of the Lider series should be built by that date, Vladimir Arutyunyan, Chief of Staff of Marine Operations of the Federal State Unitary Enterprise Atomflot, said at the Arctic Forum in Arkhangelsk on Thursday.
OK. But what's in reality?
The super-powerful nuclear icebreaker Rossiya should be built approximately by 2030, said First Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Denis Manturov. Initially, the vessel was scheduled to be put into operation in 2027.
This is the same big icebreaker that has to escort container ships that won't fit in its wake. Well, well🤨
Meanwhile, it is noted
In order to cope with the growing cargo flow, at least 3 Lider icebreakers should be built by 2030.
OK, let's wish them luck!😉
But so far, as practice shows, the Houthis are the ones who are doing the best job of this task, and Russia is supplying them with intelligence data to slow down traffic through the Suez Canal, against which background the growth of cargo turnover by several million tons should seem 'explosive'😃
And finally, listen to the captain Tymur Rudov. He speaks in russian, but there are subtitles - don't forget to switch on it